Georgia has released its first set of test results from its new Georgia Milestones Assessment System.
The tests are meant to give educators and parents a better idea as to how well students are being prepared for their futures. The new tests replace the state’s old Criterion-Referenced Competency Test (CRCT).
According to Georgia State Superintendent Richard Woods, “Under
the CRCT, Georgia had some of the lowest expectations in the nation for its
students. Too many students were labeled as proficient when, in reality, they
had not fully mastered the standards and needed additional support. That hurt
our kids, who need to be competitive with others across the country and hurt
our teachers by making it difficult for them to have a true picture of the
academic strengths and weakness of their students.”
While it is commendable that Georgia take a stronger
interest in preparing its students for a competitive global workplace, the
results from this first set of tests are not encouraging.
Using four levels of performance, students needed to
score in one of the top two levels to show they were ready to advance to the
next grade. For those subjects showing the best results (biology, U.S. history,
and economics/business) at the high school level, fewer than 40 percent of
students were ready to be promoted to the next grade level.
In mathematics, 38 to 39 percent of students across the state in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades were ready to be promoted. Unfortunately, this dropped down 34 percent when high school students were tested on their knowledge of coordinate algebra, and dropped to 33 percent when they were tested on analytic geometry.
Source: Georgia Department of Education
In mathematics, 38 to 39 percent of students across the state in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades were ready to be promoted. Unfortunately, this dropped down 34 percent when high school students were tested on their knowledge of coordinate algebra, and dropped to 33 percent when they were tested on analytic geometry.
Source: Georgia Department of Education
In English and language arts, the results were slightly
better with 38 percent of 9th grade students passing literature and composition
and 35 percent of high school students passing American literature and
composition.
Employers consistently complain that new workers lack the
skills needed to be productive. Companies are reluctant to spend the money to
train workers knowing that once trained, these same workers can leave for
better paying jobs.
That leaves it up to the state and individuals. If
Georgia wants to compete in a global economy, the state has two choices. It can
better prepare its future workforce for jobs that will demand greater verbal
and mathematical skills, or it can continue to rely on attracting better trained
workers from out of state as it has over the past decades. For example, in
Atlanta, the engine of Georgia’s job growth, only a little more than half of
its residents were born in Georgia.
The problem with this second approach is that it must
then compete with the other 49 states, as well as other nations, to both
attract companies to the state as well as people to staff those positions when
they come to Georgia. The result can be a very expensive form of economic
development; more expensive than building a world-class education system.
The role between education and economic development is
clear. As a first step that recognizes the importance of education to the state’s
economy, the Georgia Department of Education has hired an economic development specialist
to work with business executives. It is a good start, but preparing students
for those jobs by giving them the needed skills is vital.
Now that we have a more honest assessment of future
employees’ skills, it is up to everyone in the state to choose whether to take
the challenge or hope for the continued importation of skilled labor to meet Georgia
employers’ future needs.